The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act was signed into law on March 27, 2020, providing approximately $14 billion in relief funding for higher education institutions through the Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF). The language in the CARES Act provides broad discretion on the disbursement and administration of the HEERF funds, and subsequent interpretation by the Department of Education (ED) has only partially ameliorated this ambiguity. Many institutions, therefore, have questions about how to ensure compliance in disbursing these funds while maximizing the benefit to both students and the institution.
The HEERF funds have been released over the course of several months as follows:
In the months following the release of HEERF funds, ED has continued to issue guidance and Baker Tilly has connected with representatives from over 100 higher education institutions in various forums to discuss key questions, opportunities and challenges presented by the CARES Act. As a result, we have developed interpretive guidance in the form of three sets of frequently asked questions (FAQ), one addressing the student assistance funds, one addressing the institutional assistance funds and one addressing the Section 18004(a)(2) and (a)(3) funds.
Expand the section(s) below to view the FAQ.
Note: The student aid FAQ and institutional aid FAQ have been updated as of Dec. 10, 2020, to include the latest guidance.
On April 9, 2020, the U.S. Secretary of Education announced initial plans to provide funding to U.S. colleges and universities under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act. The Secretary’s letter outlined the goals and expectations of the first approximately $7 billion in funding from the Department of Education (ED) to U.S. institutions. The goal of these funds is to “provide students with emergency financial aid grants to help cover expenses related to the disruption of campus operations due to coronavirus,” and to get these funds to students “as quickly as possible.”
Colleges and universities now face administrative and strategic questions as they move forward with providing these funds to students. ED has offered guidance (through the Secretary’s letter as well as the Recipient’s Funding Certification and Agreement: Emergency Financial Aid Grants to Students [referred to herein as Student Assistance Funding Certification] and subsequent Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) documents updated Oct. 14, 2020; see Resources below) as to how these funds should be spent, who should receive funds and how to process, record and report these disbursements, yet some room for interpretation remains.
Since April 2020, Baker Tilly has connected with representatives from nearly 100 institutions in various forums to discuss key questions, opportunities, and challenges presented by the CARES Act. Below we have summarized these questions and related current guidance and considerations, as of Dec. 10, 2020.
The CARES Act provides institutions with significant discretion on how to award the emergency assistance to students. As outlined in Division B, Title VIII, Section 18004 of the CARES Act, the only statutory requirement is that the funds be used to “provide emergency financial aid grants to students for expenses related to the disruption of campus operations due to coronavirus (including eligible expenses under a student’s cost of attendance, such as food, housing, course materials, technology, health care, and child care).”
This means that each institution may develop its own system and process for determining how to allocate these funds, including identifying recipient groups, establishing grant amounts, developing disbursement mechanisms, considering application methods, and addressing compliance documentation and reporting protocols.
Per the Student Assistance Funding Certification, each recipient must agree to “not use the advanced funds to reimburse itself for any costs or expenses, including but not limited to any costs associated with significant changes to the delivery of instruction due to the coronavirus and/or any refunds or other benefits that Recipient previously issued to students.” Further, ED’s FAQ document clarified that these funds cannot be used to reimburse institutions for refunds provided to students for room, board, tuition, or fees. Nor can the funds be used to reimburse institutions for costs incurred to provide information technology hardware and other related equipment to students.
Per the Student Assistance Funding Certification, each recipient must agree to “not use the advanced funds to reimburse itself for any costs or expenses, including but not limited to any costs associated with significant changes to the delivery of instruction due to the coronavirus and/or any refunds or other benefits that Recipient previously issued to students." ED’s FAQ document does not explicitly address future refunds; however, based on ED’s answer regarding refunds already made, it is reasonable to assume that any refunds (either previously issued or to be issued in the future) would not be covered by this funding.
The Student Assistance Funding Certification states that the emergency financial aid grants are to be made “directly to students for their expenses related to the disruption of campus operations due to coronavirus, such as food, housing, course materials, technology, health care, and child-care expenses.” This would imply that these funds should not be used to pay for tuition and fees for students.
No. Per item 2 of the Student Assistance Funding Certification, "Recipient shall not use the advanced funds to reimburse itself for any costs or expenses related to the disruption of campus operations due to coronavirus.” Further, ED’s FAQ document states in question 26, “the institution may not use that portion of the Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund set aside for emergency financial aid grants to students to satisfy a student’s outstanding account balance.”
The Secretary’s April 9, 2020, letter stated, “each institution may develop its own system and process for determining how to allocate these funds, which may include distributing the funds to all students or only to students who demonstrate significant need.” Further, the interim final rule published by ED on June 17, 2020 formalizes the definition of “student” by stating, “Congress intended the category of those eligible for ‘emergency financial aid grants to students’ in section 18004 of the CARES Act to be limited to those individuals eligible for title IV assistance.” Specifically:
Must students have shown need previously or prove need currently?
No. This is not need-based aid and ED has specified that recipients can include students who did not file a Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) or demonstrate financial need.
Can these funds be provided to students in programs that were solely online prior to the pandemic?
No. ED’s FAQ document, question 20, states that “those students who were enrolled exclusively in an online program on March 13, 2020, the date of the President’s Proclamation, ‘Declaring a National Emergency Concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Outbreak,’ Federal Register Vol. 85, No. 53 at 15337- 38, are not eligible for emergency financial aid grants.”
Can these funds be provided to incoming freshmen?
Yes. ED’s FAQ document states in question 27, “the intent of the CARES Act is to make emergency financial aid grants immediately available to students.” However, “if funds remain after making these immediate disbursements, eligible students enrolled during subsequent terms may receive emergency financial aid grants even if they were not enrolled during the spring 2020 term.” The FAQ document acknowledges that students may incur expenses resulting from the disruption of campus operations due to coronavirus after the semester or quarter in which the national emergency was declared.
Can these funds be provided to graduating seniors?
Guidance from ED's FAQ document does not explicitly forbid or allow institutions to award emergency financial aid grants to graduating seniors. Should institutions award funding to students who incurred expenses prior to graduating in spring 2020, we suggest documenting the methodology for and consistently applying decisions regarding timing and eligibility.
Can these funds be provided to international or undocumented students (i.e., students who would not be eligible for Title IV financial aid)?
No. This was previously an area of ambiguity, but the interim final rule published by ED on June 17, 2020 clarified that in order to receive emergency financial aid grants, students must be eligible to relieve Title IV financial aid. This excludes undocumented, international, and Differed Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) students, among others, from receiving emergency financial aid grants through the CARES Act. The rule specifies that grants that have already been distributed are not subject to the restriction.
However, there are exceptions for certain institutions. On June 12, 2020, a federal judge in Washington state issued a preliminary injunction stopping ED’s interim final rule from taking effect in that state. Similarly, a federal judge in California ruled in favor of California Community Colleges on June 17, 2020, stating that ED can neither enforce the limitations on student eligibility nor penalize colleges for providing grants to students who are not eligible for Title IV aid within the California Community College system. Additionally, on Sept. 8, 2020, a court in the state of Massachusetts has preliminarily enjoined ED from enforcing the interim final rule as to any institution of higher education in Massachusetts and any student attending a school that is located in Massachusetts.
No. An application process is not required per current ED guidance. While not specifically required by guidance from ED, a common practice is for institutions to use an application to best identify needs in the current environment and to document the fact that students have been impacted by eligible expenses. However, under current guidance, institutions may also consider allocating funds using an alternative methodology that does not utilize an application process if they can gain assurance that students incurred eligible expenses.
ED’s current guidance allows for considerable flexibility in allocating these funds. Institutions should aim to develop a reasonable and consistent approach that will both benefit students and support institutional objectives. However, it is important to note that the more complex the allocation, the greater the administrative burden and potentially the greater the timeline. Regardless of allocation method, institutions must ensure that funds are used to cover eligible expenses associated with the disruption of campus operations as stated in the Student Assistance Funding Certification.
Under current guidance, institutions are considering allocation options such as:
The Student Assistance Funding Certification references a disbursement period of one year from the date of the Certification and Agreement. ED's FAQ document withdrew the previously communicated timeframe of Sept. 30, 2022, and clarified in question 6 that institutions have one year from the date of the award specified in the Grant Award Notification (GAN) to spend HEERF funds.
Per ED's FAQ document, question 19, the suggested methods include:
Further, ED states that the “disbursement of the emergency financial aid grant to the student must remain unencumbered by the institution; debts, charges, fees, or other amounts owed to the institution may not be deducted from the emergency financial aid grant.”
A common practice has been for schools to process emergency financial aid grants as checks through the student’s account to clearly document the disbursement for reporting purposes. It is critical that grants disbursed to student accounts not be applied against any outstanding or upcoming balances, in line with guidance above from ED.
ED has provided a great deal of discretion as to how each institution chooses to award the emergency grants to students. Many forms of other financial aid use a need-based formula to determine eligibility, coupled with the discretion of professional judgment for unforeseen or unusual circumstances. To ensure students are informed of the availability of the funding, institutions are looking to a mix of communication mechanisms, including emails, targeted outreach (e.g., using current financial aid system to communicate to those students who are most likely to have need, students who have already taken out emergency loans), communication via professors and/or counselors, social media, and institutional websites.
Based on current available guidance, it is assumed that institutions may draw down the funds all at once and hold funds in an account until fully expended. Our recommendation would be to hold these funds in a separate account to simplify the tracking of funds as well as any interest earned. The Higher Education Stimulus funding appears to be subject to the requirements of the Uniform Guidance audit requirements, which include compliance requirements surrounding cash management (similar to handling of Title IV funds). While ED has instituted the “3-day rule” for Title IV purposes, stating all advance funds must be made available to students within three days of drawdown, it is not clear if this rule will be implemented for the stimulus funding. The Student Assistance Funding Certification references the funds as “advanced funds” and requires the institution to hold these “funds in trust for students and act in the nature of a fiduciary.” Further, it states that: “Recipient shall promptly and to the greatest extent practicable distribute all the advanced funds in the form of emergency financial aid grants to students by one year from the date of this Certification and Agreement.” Lastly, the agreement requires reporting on the use of funds to ED starting 30 days after the date of the agreement and continuing every 45 days thereafter.
No, the IRS recently issued clarification that these payments made to students would not be considered taxable income as they are qualified as disaster relief payments under section 139 of the Internal Revenue Code. Therefore, the grant is not included in a student’s gross income. It should be noted that if a student chooses to use these funds to pay for course materials, they would not be able to claim these costs as a deduction on their income tax return since these funds are not included in their gross income.
If the funds are paid from the Federal Emergency Grant stimulus, they are not counted in the calculation of a student’s expected family contribution; ED does not consider these individual emergency financial aid grants to constitute Federal financial aid. HEERF Frequently Asked Questions, originally published by ED on Oct. 2, 2020 state, “the emergency financial aid grants under the CARES Act are not considered Title IV aid.” We anticipate that the IRS may provide guidance regarding the impact on 1098-Ts.
Nothing in the statements or publications made by ED indicates that institutions are required to obtain documentation to support students’ spending of the funds. In addition, ED’s guidance has not mentioned documentation expectations and it can be assumed that requiring receipts from students would be an unreasonable expectation for documentation.
A Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number has been assigned to the Higher Education Stabilization Funding (CFDA 84.425). Since Office of Management Budget (OMB) has provided a CFDA number, it is assumed that these funds will be subject to Uniform Guidance and Single Audit reporting requirements. Additionally, the Student Assistance Funding Certification makes reference to other OMB requirements. There have been cases where federal programs with CFDA numbers have not been subject to these requirements (e.g., certain American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funds), but that scenario is unlikely.
We are awaiting further guidance on expectations for documentation and compliance audit procedures. What is most important is that the institution documents its methodology for allocation of the funding and consistently applies that methodology to all students. ED's Oct. 2, 2020 FAQ document, question 8, clarifies that grant funds awarded under the HEERF are subject to the requirements of Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR part 200.
ED has released interim reporting guidelines for the reporting requirements for the Student Portion of the HEERF funding.
The Certification and Agreement directs each institution applying for HEERF funds to comply with Section 18004(e) of the CARES Act and submit an initial report (the “30-day Fund Report”) to the Secretary thirty (30) days from the date of the institution’s Certification and Agreement to the ED. ED has since issued an Electronic Announcement dated Aug. 31, 2020 that decreases the frequency of reporting after the initial 30-day period from every 45 days thereafter to every calendar quarter. The required elements as stated in the Electronic Announcement include:
The Electronic Announcement dated Aug. 31, 2020 also provides clarifications regarding reporting item #4 above.
ED published additional guidance on May 15, 2020, clarifying that:
The Student Assistance Funding Certification includes the following condition: “Recipient has continued to pay all of its employees and contractors during the period of any disruptions or closures to the greatest extent practicable.” The use of the term “all” for employees could be assumed to include student employees. ED has not provided specific guidance on this topic; this appears to give the institution a degree of flexibility to retain all employees to the greatest extent practicable. Institutions would be advised to document the basis and approvals of any determination that retaining all employees is not practicable.
ED includes the following disclaimer in its FAQ document: “These FAQs constitute a guidance document. Guidance documents represent the Department of Education’s current thinking on a topic. They do not create or confer any rights for or on any person and do not impose any requirements beyond those required under applicable law and regulations. Guidance documents lack the force and effect of law.”
However, the interim final rule published by ED on June 17, 2020 carries the force of law, with the exception of rulings impacting Washington State, Massachusetts and California Community Colleges outlined above.
Resources:
April 9, 2020, Letter from the Secretary of Education
Methodology for Calculating Allocations
The Hope Center Guide to Emergency Grant Aid Distribution
Interim final rule regarding student eligibility
Electronic announcement dated Aug. 31, 2020
ED's HEERF Frequently Asked Questions Rollup Document (issued Oct. 14, 2020)
On April 21, 2020, the U.S. Department of Education (ED) announced the availability of the second portion of funding to U.S. colleges and universities under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act. The Secretary’s letter outlined the goals and expectations of the approximately $6 billion in funding from ED to U.S. institutions to provide relief assistance directly to institutions. The goal of these funds is to “to cover any costs associated with significant changes to the delivery of instruction due to the coronavirus.”
Colleges and universities now face administrative and strategic questions as they move forward with using these funds. ED has offered guidance (through the Secretary’s letter as well as the Recipient’s Funding Certification and Agreement for the Institutional Portion of the Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (referred to herein as Institutional Assistance Funding Certification) and subsequently issued Frequently Asked Questions [FAQ]) as to how these funds should be spent and the expectations for record-keeping and documentation of internal controls for the expenditures.
ED has given institutions broad discretion over the use of these funds. As outlined in Division B, Title VIII, Section 18004 of the CARES Act, the institutional funds can be used “to cover any costs associated with significant changes to the delivery of instruction due to the coronavirus, so long as such costs do not include payment to contractors for the provision of pre-enrollment recruitment activities; endowments; or capital outlays associated with facilities related to athletics, sectarian instruction, or religious worship.”
Many institutions suffered a significant financial impact when they refunded students for a portion of the Spring semester’s housing, food, parking, health center fees and other services. ED clearly states in the Institutional Assistance Funding Certification that, “it is permissible for Recipient to use the funds for Recipient’s Institutional Costs to reimburse itself for costs related to refunds made to students for housing, food, or other services that Recipient could no longer provide.”
In addition, many institutions incurred significant expenses when quickly transitioning their students to online or distance education, including providing laptops to students, investing in online platforms and providing internet access to allow for online instruction. ED likewise states that these funds can be used to reimburse the institution, “for hardware, software, or internet connectivity that Recipient may have purchased on behalf of students or provided to students.”
The Secretary’s letter also recommended, but did not require, that institutions use the funds for two purposes:
a. “to expand your remote learning programs, build your IT capacity to support such programs, and train faculty and staff to operate effectively in a remote learning environment,” or
b. “to expand support for your students with the most significant financial needs arising from the coronavirus pandemic” (i.e., supplementing the student aid portion of CARES Act assistance).
Clarification was provided on acceptable uses of the institutional funds in ED’s FAQ document. Specifically, the following items were noted (emphasis ours):
Yes. The Institutional Assistance Funding Certification states that “as a condition for receiving funds for Recipient’s Institutional Costs, Recipient must have entered into the Funding Certification and Agreement for Emergency Financial Aid Grants to Students under the CARES Act.” However, the institution does not need to have drawn down or disbursed funds to students prior to submitting the certification for the institutional funds.
It is important to note that, once the Certification and Agreement form is submitting related to student aid funds, the reporting timeline for those funds begins; an institution therefore may not want to submit that certification until it is ready to begin reporting on funds disbursed to students for emergency aid.
The Institutional Assistance Funding Certification states that, “Recipient shall promptly and to the greatest extent practicable use the funds for Recipient’s Institutional Costs by one year from the date of this Certification and Agreement.” Similar to the student aid funds, institutions will have one year from the date of certification to spend the funds, but it is assumed that ED would prefer that these funds be encumbered as expeditiously as possible. ED’s FAQ document withdraws the previously communicated timeframe of September 30, 2022, and clarifies that institutions have one year from the date of the award specified in the Grant Award Notification (GAN) to spend HEERF funds.
A Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number has been assigned to the Higher Education Stabilization Funding (CFDA 84.425E), with the specific letter following the CFDA indicating which funding source it relates to under the Education Stabilization Fund (e.g., Higher Education Emergency Relief, Education Stabilization Fund Discretionary Grants, etc.). Since the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has provided a CFDA number, it is assumed that these funds will be subject to Uniform Guidance and Single Audit requirements. There has not been a clear indication as to whether or not these programs would be part of a cluster for Single Audit testing. We anticipate that all sources under the Education Stabilization Funding will be audited as one program (e.g., 84.425B, 84.425C, 84.425E).
Institutions should assume detailed expense tracking and reporting are required as well as documentation that supports they have internal controls in place to comply with the guidance on use of the funds. ED’s FAQ document states in question 52, “the institution should be prepared to report the use of the funds for Recipient’s Institutional Costs, demonstrating such use was in accordance with Section 18004(c), accounting for the amount of reimbursements to the Recipient for costs related to refunds made to students for housing, food, or other services that Recipient could no longer provide, and describing any internal controls Recipient has in place to ensure that funds were used for allowable purposes and in accordance with cash management principles institutions can expect that detailed tracking of the use of funds, justification for the use of funds.”
Additionally, the Institutional Assistance Funding Certification makes reference to other OMB requirements. There have been cases where federal programs with CFDA numbers have not been subject to these requirements (e.g., certain American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funds), but that scenario is unlikely.
In accordance with Section 15011(b)(2) of Division B of the CARES Act, institutions are required to submit quarterly reports to ED that include the amount of funds received, the amount of funds received that were expended, and a detailed list of all projects or activities that the funds were expended on. ED issued a final quarterly public reporting form in October 2020 that institutions should use to publicly post on an institution’s website. The first reporting due date was October 30, 2020, with quarterly reporting required thereafter. ED held a webinar to provide further clarity on reporting requirements, and made a recording and the PowerPoint slides available for reference. Additionally, ED created a HEERF reporting page with additional information.
The Institutional Assistance Funding Certification includes the following condition: “Recipient agrees that to the greatest extent practicable, Recipient will pay all of its employees and contractors during the period of any disruptions or closures related to the coronavirus.” ED has not provided specific guidance on this topic; this appears to give the institution a degree of flexibility to retain all employees to the greatest extent practicable. Institutions would be advised to document the basis and approvals of any determination that retaining all employees is not practicable.
In paragraph 4(b), the Secretary makes specific reference to the recipient retaining discretion, which provides the institution a fair amount of flexibility. Given that, it appears reasonable that the term “refund” would mean the reduction in revenue, regardless of actual cash distributions to students. This is predicated on the fact that a student’s credit balance may be influenced by other factors, such as an outstanding balance (or lack thereof) that was not resolved prior to the pandemic. See ED’s FAQ document.
ED clarifies in question 44 of its FAQ document that the institutional aid funds cannot be used to defray revenue losses and reiterated that the institution must use these funds “to pay expenses encumbered as a result of ‘significant changes to the delivery of instruction due to the coronavirus.’” To share the obvious exception, the CARES Act does specifically appear to allow these funds to cover lost revenue in the form of refunds made to students due to a disruption of campus operations (e.g., the example provided in Question 7).
Year-over-year losses of revenue should be documented and reported to ED. Specifically, ED’s FAQ document states in question 43 that documentation should be provided to show the losses are related to one of the following categories:
In addition, if the institution incurred costs associated with making these living arrangements or cleaning campus housing; that should be an appropriate use of these funds.
The guidance is not perfectly clear but in the Secretary’s letter it was stated that the institutional portion “is separate from the funding previously made available for Emergency Financial Aid Grants to Students.” Industry groups have somewhat varied interpretations and have asked ED to opine on this question, but as of the current guidance there does not appear to be a requirement to draw down or pay out funds proportionally over time as long as in total the institutional portion expended is equal to or less than the student portion expended.
Resources:
April 21, 2020, Letter from the Secretary of Education
Methodology for Calculating Allocations
Interim final rule regarding student eligibility
ED's HEERF Frequently Asked Questions Rollup Document (issued Oct. 14, 2020)
On April 30, 2020, the U.S. Department of Education (ED) announced the availability of the third portion of funding to U.S. colleges and universities under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act. The Secretary of Education’s letter outlined the goals and expectations of the approximately $1.4 billion in funding from ED to U.S. institutions to provide relief assistance directly to institutions under Division B, Title VIII, Section 18004(a)(2) and (3). ED has offered guidance (through the Secretary of Education’s letter as well as the Recipient’s Funding Certification and Agreement for an Award under Section 18004(a)(2) (referred to herein as 18004(a)(2) Assistance Funding Certification), and Recipient’s Funding Certification and Agreement for an Award under Section 18004(a)(3) (referred to herein as 18004(a)(3) Assistance Funding Certification).
Funding under Section 18004(a)(2) provides grants to the following entities:
Funding under Section 18004)(a)(3) provided funds through the Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education (FIPSE) to institutions that received less than $500,000 under other parts of Section 18004. ED is currently evaluating schools that received funding through Section 18004(a)(3) to assess where there is greatest unmet need.
Funding under Section 18004(a)(2) and 18004(a)(3) is in addition to the student and institutional portion under Section 18004(a)(1). See our FAQ for the student and institutional portion here.
ED provided separate allocations for each funding source. Section 18004(a)(2) allocation can be found here. Section 18004(a)(3) allocation can be found here.
The Secretary of Education stated in her letter that these funding streams can be used to “defray institutional expenses, which under Section 18004(a)(2) and Section 18004(a)(3) may include lost revenue, reimbursement for expenses already incurred, technology costs associated with the transition to distance education, faculty and staff training and payroll.” For further information regarding providing laptops to students, refer to question 42 in ED’s FAQ document.
ED’s FAQ document states in question 43 that if the recipient experiences lost revenues, the institution will need to provide documentation detailing the year-over-year decrease due to either decline in enrollment, a decline in student fees (e.g., housing, meals), a decline in parking and facilities revenue, or a decline in revenue from summer programs and other activities disrupted by COVID-19.
Additionally, the Secretary of Education stated that institutions may use the funds “for grants to students to cover any component of the student’s cost of attendance, including tuition, course materials, and technology” as long as the student receiving the grant is eligible to receive federal financial student aid under Section 484 of the Higher Education Act (HEA), which is the same eligibility standard as funding from Section 18004(a)(1), which excludes international students, undocumented students and students who were exclusively attending school online prior to March 13, 2020.
In the 18004(a)(2) Assistance Funding Certification and the 18004(a)(3) Assistance Funding Certification, the following expenses are specifically prohibited:
As of May 11, 2020, we know that there is at least one opportunity, a competitive grant program through ED, to award approximately $15 million in funding. These funds are from the balance remaining under the Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund under Section 18004(a)(3) that were not distributed. ED is currently evaluating how to best use 18004(a)(3) funds that were not distributed where there is greatest unmet need.
In accordance with Section 15011(b)(2) of Division B of the CARES Act, institutions are required to submit quarterly reports to ED that include the amount of funds received, the amount of funds received that were expended, and a detailed list of all projects or activities that the funds were expended on. ED issued a final quarterly public reporting form in October 2020 that institutions should use to publicly post on an institution’s website. The first reporting due date was October 30, 2020, with quarterly reporting required thereafter. ED held a webinar to provide further clarity on reporting requirements, and made a recording and the PowerPoint slides available for reference. Additionally, ED created a HEERF reporting page with additional information.
A Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number has been assigned to the Higher Education Stabilization Fund (CFDA 84.425E), with the specific letter following the CFDA indicating which funding source it relates to under the Education Stabilization Fund (e.g., Higher Education Emergency Relief, Education Stabilization Fund Discretionary Grants, etc.). Since the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has provided a CFDA number, it is assumed that these funds will be subject to Uniform Guidance and single audit requirements. There has not been a clear indication as to whether or not these programs would be part of a cluster for single audit testing. We anticipate that all sources under the Education Stabilization Fund will be audited as one program (e.g., 84.425B, 84.425C, 84.425E).
Institutions should assume detailed expense tracking and reporting are required as well as documentation that supports they have internal controls in place to comply with the guidance on use of the funds. Additionally, the 18004(a)(2) Assistance Funding Certification and the 18004(a)(3) Assistance Funding Certification makes reference to other OMB requirements. There have been cases where federal programs with CFDA numbers have not been subject to these requirements (e.g., certain American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funds), but that scenario is unlikely.
Resources:
April 30, 2020, Letter from the Secretary of Education
Section 18004(a)(2) ED Funding Allocations
Section 18004(a)(2) Methodology for Calculating Allocations
Section 18004(a)(3) ED Funding Allocations
Section 18004(a)(3) Methodology for Calculating Allocations
Interim final rule regarding student eligibility
ED's HEERF Frequently Asked Questions Rollup Document (issued Oct. 14, 2020)
The Baker Tilly higher education team stands ready to help clients understand the expectations and requirements associated with the HEERF funding, develop compliant, effective and viable approaches to leveraging these funds and gain assurance regarding the consistency and accuracy of funds distribution and reporting.